Comment on: Claude: Elevated errors across many models [resolved]
Anthropic's and OpenAI's products are janky and their services are unreliable, but they have incredible product-market fit and revenue growth. They deserve a ton of credit for getting the big things right.The risk for them is that someone matches their products while also having non-janky products and reliable services.Distributed systems infrastructure, especially, is much less forgiving of vibe coding than application code. Coding agents are not even close to being good enough to design and build large-scale systems the way expert humans can.There is nothing wrong with using agents to help w
Comment on: OpenAI's super PAC is funding AI-generated news site attacking industry critics
If anything this shows how pangram is unreliable. Chances are, if someone is running an article generation thing, it'll be 100% generated. Writing 3 / 100 articles "by hand" doesn't make any sense.
Comment on: Be skeptical of OpenAI's rogue hacker agent story
The AI companies are desperately trying to market all their products as something they're not, growing intelligence. In line with that they have constantly leaned heavily on stating how dangerous they are, right before they release a new model or product.It was OpenAI marketing. Hugging Face's response is so 'holy shit AI is awesome' it's hard not to also believe they were in on the stunt. They'd also not have to really worry about fallout since any data obtained or accessed wouldn't actually have been breached.
Comment on: Apple says more ex-employees may have taken confidential data to OpenAI
The outcome shouldn't depend whether they had "poor" security anyway. If I leave my front door locked, it might increase the chances I get robbed, but it doesn't make robbing me legal.
Comment on: Apple says more ex-employees may have taken confidential data to OpenAI
Saw this in the legal filing:"he took advantage of an authentication bug to gain access to Apple’s confidential third-party cloud repository to download at
least thirty-seven highly sensitive and proprietary technical documents related to, among other things,
Apple’s hardware technologies and research and development."Anybody know what they mean by "third party" ? Who provides Apple internal employees with a cloud repository?
Comment on: Apple says more ex-employees may have taken confidential data to OpenAI
stealing: "To take (the property of another) without right or permission."A Trademark is considered intellectual property. It is theft, and Disney could still drop a boot on the industry. Similar works found in high-dimension vector search spaces also do not escape legal peril in copyright similarity cases.Perhaps some conflated the methodology of training and use of generative mechanisms with the legal interpretation of "uncopyrightable" output in commercial settings. =3https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhgYMH6n004
Comment on: Apple says more ex-employees may have taken confidential data to OpenAI
> Apple is doing it right, simple high level statements.OpenAI is acting like a teenager posting screenshots of literal texts and being overall petulant.Or you know, another perspective: Apple filed a very public lawsuit with some very explosive allegations, and OpenAI responded with receipts showing some of those allegations to be rooted in Apple's own incompetence. Sure, many more allegations are still unaddressed, but based on these screenshots a neutral observer could realistically question those too.> This is open and shut. The mature company will win this.This is not OpenAI's first rodeo